🔗 Share this article

In spite of all the proven advances of contemporary medicine, some people are attracted to non-traditional or “holistic” remedies and practices. A number of these do no harm. As a cancer specialist noted in the past year, people receiving cancer treatment will often try meditation or vitamins as well. When such a practice is in addition to, and not in place of, evidence-based treatment, this is typically not a problem. If it reduces distress, it can be beneficial.

The Proliferation of Digital Wellness Figures

But the proliferation of online health influencers poses challenges that authorities and regulators in many countries have yet to grasp. An investigation into one such organization offering membership and advice to pregnant mothers has revealed numerous cases of late-term stillbirths or other serious harm involving mothers or birth attendants linked with it. While the entity is headquartered in North Carolina, its influence is international.

“For whole populations, going through labour and birth without professional support is associated with higher levels of risk for mother and baby,” as stated by a professor of midwifery.

Examining the Dangers and Background

Giving birth without medical assistance, known as free birth, is legal in countries including the UK and US. The risks are not well understood due to a absence of data. Childbirth can be a daunting prospect, and excellent care is far from guaranteed. In England, a alarming recently published report found a large majority of hospital maternity services to be unsafe or in need of improvement.

Criticisms of medical systems and specific, longstanding issues with maternity care are in many cases valid. A significant number of the women interviewed for the inquiry had previously experienced traumatic births.

Distrust and the Proliferation of Misinformation

But while mistrust of institutions may be based on experience, it has also become a breeding ground for other influencers seeking followers to their unorthodox methods and DIY philosophy. During the pandemic, a “well-being” industry ostensibly focused on healthy living was involved in spreading falsehoods about vaccines and fuelling suspicion about official advice.

Worry is rising that such ideas are gaining more widespread traction. One paper given at a medical symposium focused on misinformation, which it said had “acutely worsened in the past decade”. This investigation shows that behind the image of an rebellious community lies an operation that trains women as social media influencers as in addition to birth attendants. The group does not present itself to be a qualified medical provider.

The Need for Safeguards and Improvements

There is no turning the clock back to a time when doctors were presumed to know best. Vast quantities of scientific research are published online and many people use these to positive effect. But there is also a critical necessity for safeguards from poor advice. It is well known that the algorithms used by tech companies promote more extreme content.

In the UK, necessary reforms to maternity services cannot come soon enough. They should include the choice of home birth and the provision of data to empower women in making decisions. Ministers and organizations such as the World Health Organization should also develop strategies for the online information landscape so that science-based healthcare is not undermined.